Was the WTC Demolished by Mini Nukes?
(Ed. Note- This would explain why everything disintegrated into a fine dust.)
From Anonymous
If you want to know what really happened during 9/11, you should visit
this site:
http://thisiszionism.blogspot.com/2010/05/dimitri-khalezovs-nuclear-demolition.html
It has links to an interview with a former officer of the Soviet nuclear
intelligence unit, Dimitri Khalezov.
This interview runs for over 4 hours and has 26 parts.
I recommend you start with part 4 when he explains that the New York
building authorities will not approve the construction of skyscrapers in
NYC unless the developer also submits a demolition plan that meets with
their approval. In the case of the WTC, the developers opted for a
nuclear demolition plan. In other words, nuclear devices had been placed
under the WTC complex from the time the buildings were constructed for
their future demolition.
The Americans were scammed into believing that mini nukes were planted
in WTC1 and 2 on 9/11 because the Pentagon was hit by a missile carrying
a nuclear warhead which did not explode. I'm not even sure whether
there were any planes hitting the WTC - the TV coverage would appear
to be a complete computer fabrication (watch parts 2 and 3 of the
interview which covers this).
As a result, the Americans demolished WTC1 and 2 as the mini nukes would cause less destruction if the explosions were at ground level rather
than high up in the skyscrapers.
Be sure to watch video #14 when Khalezov talks about the collapse of WTC 7. Do you remember the BBC reported its collapse 24 mins before it fell?
Even though it was not hit by any plane....
The nukes which were to be used for the demolition of the WTC complex
(mentioned in video 4) were stored under WTC 7. Building 7 had to be
destroyed so nobody would find the underground railway system used for
delivering the nukes to WTC 1 and 2.
If you are wondering why the WTC workers were not dropping dead like
flies as in Chernobyl, watch parts 24 and 25 when Khalezov explains the
difference between acute and chronic radiation sickness and how the
Americans minimised the effect of their exposure to the radioactivity.
Khalezov has a site with a lot of info on the truth behind 9/11
http://www.911-truth.net/
His personal site is http://www.dkhalezov.com/911thology.html
His book is available from:
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/dropbox/Dimitri_Khalezov_Book_Third_Truth_911_free_11chapters.pdf
or from:
http://depositfiles.com/en/files/s5socosne
--
p314285@fastmail.fm
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Wednesday, August 04, 2010
Question from Fetzer about 9/11:
"...have you looked into any of these high tech weapons?"
Reply from Steven Jones:
"Ah, well, I just read about them. I have not been involved
in the event."
And then Fetzer starts talking over him.
Do you realize what happened in this interview?
Steven Jones denied involvement in "the event"
when the question was about high tech weapons.
DING DING DING DING!!
Jones denied involvement when the question wasn't
about involvement. It's similar to a spouse saying,
"Hi, honey. How was your day?" and the spouse
responding, "I wasn't flirting with that secretary."
Huh?
Me thinks thou dost protest too much, Steven Jones.
Nobody asked if you were involved in "the event".
Why are you denying involvement?
Something else about the response bears close scrutiny.
Jones denied his involvement in "the event" after a particular
question. That question was about high tech weapons.
This indicates that Jones knows that high tech weapons
were actually used, and when Fetzer brought it up, alarm
bells rang off and he made the mistake of denying his own
involvement.
It's basic childlike behavior. Caught red-handed? DENY!
Jones knew he was "caught" although it wasn't obvious
to the casual listener, so he went straight to denial. OMG,
I really can't believe this juicy find!
Nota bene how Fetzer immediately starts talking over
him when Jones makes this huge gaff. I'm pretty sure
Fetzer knows all about what really happened, and Jones'
role in the cover up.
Maybe they didn't work it out precisely beforehand,
and Jones was caught off guard by the question from
Fetzer. Then Fetzer had to recover control of the situation
and did so by talking over Jones.
If you don't believe this, listen to the clip yourself.
Who denies they were involved in 9/11? This is a real
question. Who NEEDS to deny they were involved in 9/11?
"...have you looked into any of these high tech weapons?"
Reply from Steven Jones:
"Ah, well, I just read about them. I have not been involved
in the event."
And then Fetzer starts talking over him.
Do you realize what happened in this interview?
Steven Jones denied involvement in "the event"
when the question was about high tech weapons.
DING DING DING DING!!
Jones denied involvement when the question wasn't
about involvement. It's similar to a spouse saying,
"Hi, honey. How was your day?" and the spouse
responding, "I wasn't flirting with that secretary."
Huh?
Me thinks thou dost protest too much, Steven Jones.
Nobody asked if you were involved in "the event".
Why are you denying involvement?
Something else about the response bears close scrutiny.
Jones denied his involvement in "the event" after a particular
question. That question was about high tech weapons.
This indicates that Jones knows that high tech weapons
were actually used, and when Fetzer brought it up, alarm
bells rang off and he made the mistake of denying his own
involvement.
It's basic childlike behavior. Caught red-handed? DENY!
Jones knew he was "caught" although it wasn't obvious
to the casual listener, so he went straight to denial. OMG,
I really can't believe this juicy find!
Nota bene how Fetzer immediately starts talking over
him when Jones makes this huge gaff. I'm pretty sure
Fetzer knows all about what really happened, and Jones'
role in the cover up.
Maybe they didn't work it out precisely beforehand,
and Jones was caught off guard by the question from
Fetzer. Then Fetzer had to recover control of the situation
and did so by talking over Jones.
If you don't believe this, listen to the clip yourself.
Who denies they were involved in 9/11? This is a real
question. Who NEEDS to deny they were involved in 9/11?
Monday, August 02, 2010
Looking at another Anti-Zionist Blog:
THE UGLY TRUTH
ASSEMBLING THE EVIDENCE FOR HIGH LIKLIHOOD OF COMING THIRD WORLD WAR
Comment Section:
knuckledragger
August 2, 2010 at 3:49 am
That’s because you’re a jew, and we both know it. An ugly one at that…Don’t complain because I say you and your kike brethren should be executed on sight. It’s your fate, and you can’t escape it. I’m not basing it on the fact that you have a bunch of jews come and talk a bunch of propaganda on your website. I’m basing it on the fact that I recognize a jew when I see one, and both YOU and YOUR WIFE are kikes. Carry on with the disinfo, but don’t think it makes you immune to execution with the rest of your tribe.
(The Ugly Truth Blogger)
MG–And this, ladies and gents, is why we are losing the battle. Not because the power of the Jews over us, but because THIS represents the “A-Team”–inbred, violent, unthinking creatures incapable of rational or moral thought. A guy who uses a pistol as his avatar and who threatens innocent women and children.
And this is supposed to be morally superior to the garbage out there who wars with us incessantly?
My God, its a miracle we’ve come as far as we have when this is what passes for ‘the resistence’.
PS–there was another guy whose MO was just like this–his name was Hal Turner and used much of the same tactics and language. As it turned out, Turner was a self-admitted FBI informant/provacateur.
(Posted by Me - Dionysus Scrolls)
I will document the A-Team super-patriot super Jew-hater's run in with the relatively Jew-protecting Me:
George Benkel says:
June 24, 2010 at 8:08 pm
“See, people like me, we know, if you leave one Jew behind, and allow it to fester, we’re going to be right back… our ancestors will be right back in this same boat another 2000 years from now if we let them live!”
You sure are mesuggener.
Have your checks cleared from the Jabotinsky Center ?
reply
*
Subverted Nation says:
June 24, 2010 at 9:28 pm
Excuse you kike mother fucker? If you don’t like what I have to say, tough fucking shit. Take your sorry ass on down the road bitch, because the real story is this. If you don’t like what I have to say, you are likely a fucking jew. The question is, how much is the ADL paying your sayanim ass to run your gullible fucking mouth on my website? Or, do you just do it because you feel it’s your duty to the tribe? You sound like a typical baby raping, nation wrecking, genocidal kike afraid to meet your fucking maker. I will be more than happy to send you there myself.
(My Response for here)
For the record, I will not apologize for having a Jewish last name. The MOTHER carries the Judaic lineage. DO YOU KNOW ANY JEWS WHOSE FATHER'S ARE RETIRED BLUE-COLLAR AUTOMOTIVE ASSEMBLY LINE WORKERS?
THE UGLY TRUTH
ASSEMBLING THE EVIDENCE FOR HIGH LIKLIHOOD OF COMING THIRD WORLD WAR
Comment Section:
knuckledragger
August 2, 2010 at 3:49 am
That’s because you’re a jew, and we both know it. An ugly one at that…Don’t complain because I say you and your kike brethren should be executed on sight. It’s your fate, and you can’t escape it. I’m not basing it on the fact that you have a bunch of jews come and talk a bunch of propaganda on your website. I’m basing it on the fact that I recognize a jew when I see one, and both YOU and YOUR WIFE are kikes. Carry on with the disinfo, but don’t think it makes you immune to execution with the rest of your tribe.
(The Ugly Truth Blogger)
MG–And this, ladies and gents, is why we are losing the battle. Not because the power of the Jews over us, but because THIS represents the “A-Team”–inbred, violent, unthinking creatures incapable of rational or moral thought. A guy who uses a pistol as his avatar and who threatens innocent women and children.
And this is supposed to be morally superior to the garbage out there who wars with us incessantly?
My God, its a miracle we’ve come as far as we have when this is what passes for ‘the resistence’.
PS–there was another guy whose MO was just like this–his name was Hal Turner and used much of the same tactics and language. As it turned out, Turner was a self-admitted FBI informant/provacateur.
(Posted by Me - Dionysus Scrolls)
I will document the A-Team super-patriot super Jew-hater's run in with the relatively Jew-protecting Me:
George Benkel says:
June 24, 2010 at 8:08 pm
“See, people like me, we know, if you leave one Jew behind, and allow it to fester, we’re going to be right back… our ancestors will be right back in this same boat another 2000 years from now if we let them live!”
You sure are mesuggener.
Have your checks cleared from the Jabotinsky Center ?
reply
*
Subverted Nation says:
June 24, 2010 at 9:28 pm
Excuse you kike mother fucker? If you don’t like what I have to say, tough fucking shit. Take your sorry ass on down the road bitch, because the real story is this. If you don’t like what I have to say, you are likely a fucking jew. The question is, how much is the ADL paying your sayanim ass to run your gullible fucking mouth on my website? Or, do you just do it because you feel it’s your duty to the tribe? You sound like a typical baby raping, nation wrecking, genocidal kike afraid to meet your fucking maker. I will be more than happy to send you there myself.
(My Response for here)
For the record, I will not apologize for having a Jewish last name. The MOTHER carries the Judaic lineage. DO YOU KNOW ANY JEWS WHOSE FATHER'S ARE RETIRED BLUE-COLLAR AUTOMOTIVE ASSEMBLY LINE WORKERS?
Sunday, August 01, 2010
THE WTC'S DECLINE AND EXODUS
Talking about "9/11 institutions", what of the WTC complex itself? What was it exactly? Most people in the world are still, I think, under the impression those towering behemoths really were the pride of US bustling capitalism, with shiny modern offices and luscious furniture - and lots of happy tenants. Hence, in order for the public to start accepting that perhaps the WTC towers were empty (and hopefully everyone knows no one can die in an empty building), this basic myth has to be blown apart.
Here are some extracts of "Divided we stand" by Eric Darton (1999) which should be quite illuminating for people who don't know - or cannot come to terms with the notion - that the towers were, in fact a redundant, decrepit and largely vacated ghost structure long before 2001.
(from p.190)
DETAILS: THE PHYSICAL PLANT
Pacing out the periphery of the trade towers in the late 1990s, one nav-
igated a cracked badlands of sidewalk crudely patched with mismatch-
ing cement. The weathered, gray (originally white) Italian marble
paving on the plaza was a spiderweb of cracks, a condition that under-
mined the addition of benches and flowerbeds and the tinkling medley
of new-age harmonics emanating from a score of tiny speakers mounted
beneath Yamasaki's arcades. Construction equipment and barricades
around the site appeared to have been deployed and then abandoned
by a retreating army.
And up in the towers, where asbestos removal was still under way,
a host of details pointed toward a rift opening up within the trade cen-
ter itself. In 1985, when New York State moved most of its offices out,
Dean Witter consolidated its operations in twenty-four floors of Tower
2 under a twenty-year lease. Visiting the brokerage and investment
firm's offices and cafeterias, one invariably found them spotlessly
maintained. But on adjacent floors, particularly those with multiple
tenants, the paint was dingy, the carpets were stained, fixtures re-
mained broken, and burned-out fluorescent lights went unreplaced, as
did discolored ceiling tiles. And the listing of a company on the direc-
tory did not reliably indicate that a company was still there.
And who indeed was there, inhabiting the self-proclaimed heart of
world trade? In 1966, as the PA was bulldozing Radio Row, the City
Planning Commission reported that "the prime objective of the WTC is
to simplify and expand international trade by centralizing and consoli-
dating within the Center essential world trade services and activi-
ties.... The Center will contain only government agencies and private
firms which play a part in international marketing and in the adminis-
trative processing of world trade. " Yet according to its own
1993 occupancy survey, the Port Authority found that trade service and
import-export tenants accounted for only 5 percent of its leases.
The Port Authority closed out the 1990s with a stream of press re-
leases announcing the rental of unimaginably huge quantities of trade
center office space to "cutting-edge" firms like Sun Microsystems. Yet
around the complex a million square feet stood empty, and the build-
ings originally intended as great catalyzing chambers of world trade
were, by degrees, transforming into a kind of disjunctive real estate
layer-cake. One story above the carpeted, wood-paneled offices of a
Japanese securities firm, a group of artists filled bare walls with boldly
colored images and hung sculptures from the exposed ceiling girders of
a vast echoing cavern. As part of a Lower Manhattan Cultural Council
program that turned some of the vacant space in the towers over to
artists rent-free, 40,000 square feet of concrete floor lay paint-
spattered and strewn with the raw materials of a creative urge that has
never been easily reconciled with the imperatives of a bottom line.
On page 204, Eric Darton mentions what is defined as 'the modest economy boost'
of the WTC1993 bombings (I kid you not!) which allowed to relocate
350 bombed-out trade center tenants into vacant office space nearby...
from p. 204
In January 1996, Governor Pataki announced that he was moving
the trade center's last state tenant, the governor's office itself, to cheaper,
more convenient space in midtown.
ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE
The February 1993 blast in the basement of the World Trade Center
killed 6 people, injured 1,000 others, displaced 50,000 workers, and
threw 900 Vista Hotel and Windows on the World employees out of
work, but it also provided a modest boost for the regional economy.
This, at any rate, was the conclusion the Port Authority came to in an
April 1993 report released six weeks after the bombing.
(...)
For the agency, this silver lining was due in part to the ease with
which the 350 bombed-out trade center tenants could be moved into
abundant vacant office space nearby. Breathing an almost palpable
sigh of relief, then-PA chair Richard Leone noted that relocating ten-
ants would have been far more protracted and expensive had the ex-
plosion occurred in the boom year of 1985.
In other words, may I tentatively presume that the 1993 bombings helped scare the sh#t out of the last remaining WTC tenants and make them get the hell outta there? You should also know that the official line (post-2001) was that "in September 2001 the WTC towers were at 95% capacity and had 400 tenants". Could that possibly have been a ...ehrm...a lie?
In any case, the material in Darton's book written in 1999 informs us that:
- After the 1993 bombings, 50,000 workers were displaced and 350 tenants were relocated outside the WTC.
- At the end of the nineties, " a stream of press releases announced the rental of unimaginably huge quantities of trade center office space."
So, this begs the question: Could they possibly have "re-populated" the WTC towers with a string of unimaginably phony press releases?
Talking about "9/11 institutions", what of the WTC complex itself? What was it exactly? Most people in the world are still, I think, under the impression those towering behemoths really were the pride of US bustling capitalism, with shiny modern offices and luscious furniture - and lots of happy tenants. Hence, in order for the public to start accepting that perhaps the WTC towers were empty (and hopefully everyone knows no one can die in an empty building), this basic myth has to be blown apart.
Here are some extracts of "Divided we stand" by Eric Darton (1999) which should be quite illuminating for people who don't know - or cannot come to terms with the notion - that the towers were, in fact a redundant, decrepit and largely vacated ghost structure long before 2001.
(from p.190)
DETAILS: THE PHYSICAL PLANT
Pacing out the periphery of the trade towers in the late 1990s, one nav-
igated a cracked badlands of sidewalk crudely patched with mismatch-
ing cement. The weathered, gray (originally white) Italian marble
paving on the plaza was a spiderweb of cracks, a condition that under-
mined the addition of benches and flowerbeds and the tinkling medley
of new-age harmonics emanating from a score of tiny speakers mounted
beneath Yamasaki's arcades. Construction equipment and barricades
around the site appeared to have been deployed and then abandoned
by a retreating army.
And up in the towers, where asbestos removal was still under way,
a host of details pointed toward a rift opening up within the trade cen-
ter itself. In 1985, when New York State moved most of its offices out,
Dean Witter consolidated its operations in twenty-four floors of Tower
2 under a twenty-year lease. Visiting the brokerage and investment
firm's offices and cafeterias, one invariably found them spotlessly
maintained. But on adjacent floors, particularly those with multiple
tenants, the paint was dingy, the carpets were stained, fixtures re-
mained broken, and burned-out fluorescent lights went unreplaced, as
did discolored ceiling tiles. And the listing of a company on the direc-
tory did not reliably indicate that a company was still there.
And who indeed was there, inhabiting the self-proclaimed heart of
world trade? In 1966, as the PA was bulldozing Radio Row, the City
Planning Commission reported that "the prime objective of the WTC is
to simplify and expand international trade by centralizing and consoli-
dating within the Center essential world trade services and activi-
ties.... The Center will contain only government agencies and private
firms which play a part in international marketing and in the adminis-
trative processing of world trade. " Yet according to its own
1993 occupancy survey, the Port Authority found that trade service and
import-export tenants accounted for only 5 percent of its leases.
The Port Authority closed out the 1990s with a stream of press re-
leases announcing the rental of unimaginably huge quantities of trade
center office space to "cutting-edge" firms like Sun Microsystems. Yet
around the complex a million square feet stood empty, and the build-
ings originally intended as great catalyzing chambers of world trade
were, by degrees, transforming into a kind of disjunctive real estate
layer-cake. One story above the carpeted, wood-paneled offices of a
Japanese securities firm, a group of artists filled bare walls with boldly
colored images and hung sculptures from the exposed ceiling girders of
a vast echoing cavern. As part of a Lower Manhattan Cultural Council
program that turned some of the vacant space in the towers over to
artists rent-free, 40,000 square feet of concrete floor lay paint-
spattered and strewn with the raw materials of a creative urge that has
never been easily reconciled with the imperatives of a bottom line.
On page 204, Eric Darton mentions what is defined as 'the modest economy boost'
of the WTC1993 bombings (I kid you not!) which allowed to relocate
350 bombed-out trade center tenants into vacant office space nearby...
from p. 204
In January 1996, Governor Pataki announced that he was moving
the trade center's last state tenant, the governor's office itself, to cheaper,
more convenient space in midtown.
ACCENTUATE THE POSITIVE
The February 1993 blast in the basement of the World Trade Center
killed 6 people, injured 1,000 others, displaced 50,000 workers, and
threw 900 Vista Hotel and Windows on the World employees out of
work, but it also provided a modest boost for the regional economy.
This, at any rate, was the conclusion the Port Authority came to in an
April 1993 report released six weeks after the bombing.
(...)
For the agency, this silver lining was due in part to the ease with
which the 350 bombed-out trade center tenants could be moved into
abundant vacant office space nearby. Breathing an almost palpable
sigh of relief, then-PA chair Richard Leone noted that relocating ten-
ants would have been far more protracted and expensive had the ex-
plosion occurred in the boom year of 1985.
In other words, may I tentatively presume that the 1993 bombings helped scare the sh#t out of the last remaining WTC tenants and make them get the hell outta there? You should also know that the official line (post-2001) was that "in September 2001 the WTC towers were at 95% capacity and had 400 tenants". Could that possibly have been a ...ehrm...a lie?
In any case, the material in Darton's book written in 1999 informs us that:
- After the 1993 bombings, 50,000 workers were displaced and 350 tenants were relocated outside the WTC.
- At the end of the nineties, " a stream of press releases announced the rental of unimaginably huge quantities of trade center office space."
So, this begs the question: Could they possibly have "re-populated" the WTC towers with a string of unimaginably phony press releases?
rhw007 said:
We NEED more Soldiers to do a WikiLeaks based on their making hard decisions to STOP killing based on a lie.
Sword:
I clearly cannot condone this wikileaks website - nor the motives behind whatever agenda they have.
...
Sword's Blog is:
HHMSS Sword
The repository of thought that the pentagon would rather have stay silent... ...
Asked and Answered. The drugged-up insider homosexuals can't get their stories straight. They're well-funded and will get everyone killed in upcoming Economic Collapse and inevitable WW3.
We NEED more Soldiers to do a WikiLeaks based on their making hard decisions to STOP killing based on a lie.
Sword:
I clearly cannot condone this wikileaks website - nor the motives behind whatever agenda they have.
...
Sword's Blog is:
HHMSS Sword
The repository of thought that the pentagon would rather have stay silent... ...
Asked and Answered. The drugged-up insider homosexuals can't get their stories straight. They're well-funded and will get everyone killed in upcoming Economic Collapse and inevitable WW3.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
