Question from Fetzer about 9/11:
"...have you looked into any of these high tech weapons?"

Reply from Steven Jones:
"Ah, well, I just read about them. I have not been involved
in the event."

And then Fetzer starts talking over him.

Do you realize what happened in this interview?
Steven Jones denied involvement in "the event"
when the question was about high tech weapons.

DING DING DING DING!!

Jones denied involvement when the question wasn't
about involvement. It's similar to a spouse saying,
"Hi, honey. How was your day?" and the spouse
responding, "I wasn't flirting with that secretary."

Huh?

Me thinks thou dost protest too much, Steven Jones.
Nobody asked if you were involved in "the event".
Why are you denying involvement?

Something else about the response bears close scrutiny.
Jones denied his involvement in "the event" after a particular
question. That question was about high tech weapons.
This indicates that Jones knows that high tech weapons
were actually used, and when Fetzer brought it up, alarm
bells rang off and he made the mistake of denying his own
involvement.

It's basic childlike behavior. Caught red-handed? DENY!
Jones knew he was "caught" although it wasn't obvious
to the casual listener, so he went straight to denial. OMG,
I really can't believe this juicy find!

Nota bene how Fetzer immediately starts talking over
him when Jones makes this huge gaff. I'm pretty sure
Fetzer knows all about what really happened, and Jones'
role in the cover up.

Maybe they didn't work it out precisely beforehand,
and Jones was caught off guard by the question from
Fetzer. Then Fetzer had to recover control of the situation
and did so by talking over Jones.

If you don't believe this, listen to the clip yourself.

Who denies they were involved in 9/11? This is a real
question. Who NEEDS to deny they were involved in 9/11?