by Matt Giwer, © 2007 [June]

In the year 2000 Israel said there were one million holocaust survivors still alive and many are in financial need. That number is corroborated close enough[3] by other Jewish sources. Survivor implies something escapes by the skin of one's teeth and it certainly is terrible that so many are in financial need. Cue the extortion music. [urls to official claims of this number]

As we know the average life expectancy giving a number of people alive in a year is the same as giving the percentage alive in that year to a first order approximation. In giving a number Israel also gave the percent.

The problem is the average life span in 2000 for Europeans was about 75 years.[1] The year 2000 was 55 years after the end of it.[2] So if all ages from newborn to the elderly were among the survivors then 55/75th have died since 1945 and the number alive in 2000 equals 20/75th of the number in 1945, a bit less than 1/3 of them.

Elementary algebra[4] says if there were one million alive in the year 2000 then there were 3.75 million holocaust survivors alive in 1945. That is a huge number.

But wait! There's more! [Cue Popiel slice and dice logo]

If the Nazis killed those unable to work it gets worse. Lets assume 13 years old is old enough to work. So in 1945 the youngest survivor was 13. That means it is as though there were one million survivors in the year 2012. As that is 67 years after it ended then 67/75ths have died and one million represents 8/75ths of the survivors in 1945. That means there were roughly 9.375 million holocaust survivors in 1945.

Pick any unable-to-work age you want down to newborn and still we are left with 3.5 million in 1945 as the minimum number of holocaust survivors. But if we have newborns surviving then we have a good fraction of women taking care of the children and thus not working. That weighs against the trademarked Pure Nazi Evil. Not working everyone to death stains the trademark of Pure Nazi Evil.

We must conclude the official number asserted for purposes of claiming compensation is either a lie for the purpose of extortion or there was no extermination in the holy holocaust. And if the former is a lie, lying in one leads to a reasonable assumption of lying in all and it is up to the liar to show he is not lying this time.

OTOH we can look at the 1945 Red Cross numbers for all concentration camp survivors as 120,000. That means there should be 33,000 survivors today assuming no extermination of those unable to work. Assuming extermination of those unable to work as under 13 we have roughly 10,000 survivors. If we expand camp survivors to those who survived by hiding either their identity or physically perhaps the number can be doubled or even tripled before one cannot keep a straight face saying it.

Norman Finkelstein quotes his mother as asking, If all of these people are survivors, who did Hitler kill?

I can add to her consternation. Every conceivable modification to the data short of a fountain of youth for holocaust survivors, short of increasing their life expectancy, increases the number of survivors in 1945. Even a million survivors in 1945 (no one died in 55 years) begs the question of what does holocaust mean.

In a larger context we can look at the distribution of Jews in Europe during WWII and at its maximum expansion only 3 to 4 million Jews lived under Nazi rule. Taking the official number of one million without extermination of those unable to work we have every Jew who was at any time under Nazi rule claiming to be a holocaust survivor. So again, who did Hitler kill? [url to jewish 1938 population figures produced by Jews not knowing the later mythology was coming]


1] Life expectancy in 1945 was on the order of 67 years overall for Europe but included unsanitary eastern Europe of about 10 years shorter where most of this holocaust is supposed to have happened. However this changes nothing as those who had the poor lifestyle as young adults in eastern Europe would be dead before 2000 even if they had a 75 year life expectancy in 1945. This 75 year life expectancy applies mainly to the youngest in 1945. On average it applies to those 20 and younger in 1945.

[2] The first approximation rule of demographics is there an equal number in all age groups. To make it easy, say the population is 75 million. That would mean 1 million aged 0-1, 1 million age 1-2 and so forth up to 1 million aged 74-75. Of course no population is a first order approximation. But all the interesting aspects of demographics are departures from this ideal. For purposes of this discussion the only interest is the Z-shaped curve around the average life expectancy. These days the Z-curve has a large number living much longer than the average but in fact there is an equally large number dying before the average age. If it were otherwise the average life expectancy would increase so the same considerations are always true. They are kept true by moving the baseline. It is also true that 75 is not good for all European countries but it is close enough for this exercise.

[3] In this case "close enough" means there is no official source of the number rather there is a ballpark range of numbers that different groups adopt as the true number.

[4]

20
-- X population-in-1945 = 1,000,000
75

75
population-in-1945 = 1,000,000 X --
20

Michael Moore makes fun of police

And he tries to stir up racial trouble. Like Alex Jones and Jon Stewart, Moore does not encourage discussions of our problems. Instead he ridicules and encourages fear of the police. The jokes are funny, but laughing at the police doesn't help the police, and it doesn't help us. The police and military have become Zionist attack dogs. Hating or laughing at them will not help us! The citizens need to do a better job voting, and the police need to clean up their leadership, and then do their job by arresting Michael Moore and his agent Ari Emanuel and his brother Rahm, Larry Silverstein, the Bronfmans, and thousands of others who are obviously covering up Zionist crimes.

The detailed timeline of the events surrounding the police assault and TASERing of Christopher Bollyn is now on-line at Rumor Mill News:

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=101044

It is also on his webpage at The French Connection website:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn/Timeline_of_Events-arrest.html

This timeline clearly reveals that the Hoffman Estates police conspired to assault and TASER Bollyn before they arrived at his home.

The real question is who was really behind this attack on one of the leading independent investigators of the "false flag" 9/11 terror attacks.

Q: Many thanks for the excellent film clip.

re, from above: "Well, it was in all the newspapers, or at least it was in Time magazine and in US News and World Report and that story has been verified by a number of senior israeli military officers and reporters."

I believe that is a direct quote from Lieutenant James Ennes, of U.S.S. Liberty, being interviewed by Daryl Smith. I would like to fill in a few blanks, if I may. Apparently, there were some very lucid accounts of this occurrence in the ISRAELI papers as well:

1,000+ Egyptian Military Officers Executed by Israeli Army in 1967

Reprinted with permission from The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, May/June 1996

USS Liberty: Did Israel commit one war crime to hide another? By James M. Ennes, Jr.

Article Published on U.S.S. Liberty Memorial Pages, March 27, 1998

Washington Report readers know the story well. In 1967 on the fourth day of the Six Day War, the armed forces of Israel attacked the American intelligence ship USS Liberty for 90 minutes in international waters in broad daylight following several hours of close, low-level reconnaissance. Thirty-four men died, 171 were hurt, and the ship was so badly damaged that it had to be scrapped.

The government of Israel has lied about the circumstances ever since, telling a story markedly different from that told by American survivors. Congress has refused to question Israel's demonstrably false account, even though the State Department's own analysis finds the Israeli story to be untrue.

Yet the most pressing question remaining from that infamy is not whether the attack was deliberate. That was settled long ago for most reasonable people. THE QUESTION IS WHY Israel risked its cozy relationship with America by killing American seaman on the high seas.

Indeed, spokesmen for Israel use that question in Israel's defense. Why, they ask, would Israel risk alienating its American friends?

So why did Israel attack? Intelligence analysts and others have long supposed that Israel attacked to prevent the ship from reporting the impending invasion of the Golan Heights, then imminent despite cease fire pleas by the United States. Israel's defenders reject that explanation.

Recent reports in the Israeli and Egyptian press suggest another powerful possibility.

According to eyewitness accounts by Israeli officers and journalists, the Israeli Army - the army that claims to hold itself to a higher moral standard than other armies - executed as many as 1,000 Arab prisoners during the 1967 war.

Historian GABBY BRON [ quoted in film clip ] wrote in the YEDIOT AHRONOT in ISRAEL that he witnessed Israeli troops executing Egyptian prisoners on the morning of June 8, 1967, in the Sinai town of El Arish.

Bron reported that he saw about 150 Egyptian POWs being held at the El Arish airport where they were sitting on the ground, densely crowded together with their hands held on the back of their necks. Every few minutes, Bron writes, Israeli soldiers would escort an Egyptian POW from the group to a hearing conducted by two men in Israeli army uniforms. Then the man would be taken away, given a spade, and forced to dig his own grave.

"I watched as (one) man dug a hole for about 15 minutes," Bron wrote. "Afterwards, the (Israeli military) policeman told him to throw the shovel away, and then one of them leveled an Uzi at him and shot two short bursts, each of three or four bullets."

Bron says he witnessed about ten such executions, until the grave was filled. Then an Israeli Colonel threatened him with a revolver, forcing him to leave the area.

USS Liberty was nearby

As those executions were underway, America's most sophisticated intelligence platform, USS Liberty, was less than 13 miles from El Arish.

We were close enough to see the town mosque with the naked eye. With binoculars we could make out individual buildings and might have seen the executions if we had looked in the right place.

Could our operators have heard voice radio messages revealing these killings? Did senior Israeli officers sanction the murders, or did they learn of them? How would they have reacted to the knowledge that USS Liberty was nearby and might have heard incriminating radio traffic?

Would they have been desperate enough to attack an American ship? .....................................

What a 'cryptical' way that history has, of finally revealing itself ! Perhaps these new ISRAELI revelations, ( they do it every time ) will be the proverbial frosting on their cake, by finally and completely airing out the real U.S.S. LIBERTY MASSACRE, which ironically enough, just happened to occur SIMULTANEOUSLY with this EGYPTIAN MASSACRE, right within striking distance.

It should now be much better known how these pathological prevaricators simply love to crow about their murderous exploits. So maybe this time we should just take their own word for it, and let them "dig their OWN grave", so to speak.

Is it any coincidence that an ISRAELI filmmaker would release a DOCUMENTARY of these exploits, in the very week preceding Purim ? For what ? To "entertain" the troops, for the "festival" ? - ( with tales of heroic "massacres" ? )

...and just in case you might think I'm being 'biased' in my presentation, let's not forget to give the Zionist CAMERA some good "exposure" for quite promptly crawling all over this like flies on shitpaper:
http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_context=7&x_issue=66&x_article=1291

NEW EVIDENCE EMERGES OF POLICE CONSPIRACY TO ASSAULT & TASER BOLLYN

Posted By: ChristopherBollyn

EVIDENCE EMERGES OF POLICE CONSPIRACY
TO ASSAULT & TASER BOLLYN
3 Minutes Before Arriving on Scene Police Reported "Fight in Progress"

By Christopher Bollyn
March 6, 2007

Hoffman Estates, Illinois – Two emergency vehicles from the Hoffman Estates Fire Department were at the Bollyn residence at 20:03:57 – only one second after the arrival of the heavily-armed tactical unit of three men wearing body armor, who assaulted and TASERed me in my front yard on August 15, 2006.

To help establish the facts, I called the chief of the fire department to ask why the medics had not examined me after I had been assaulted and TASERed.

Deputy Chief Robert Gorvett, a local resident who grew up in Hoffman Estates, promptly returned the call and investigated the fire department/police transmissions and communications which preceded the assault.

In the assault, my right elbow was fractured and my body was subjected to 50,000 volts from a TASER gun placed directly over my lower back.

What Dep. Fire Chief Gorvett told me indicates that the police had provided false information to the central 911 dispatch – saying there was a "fight in progress" – which resulted in the dispatcher calling in fire department emergency vehicles. The 911 dispatch had heard this false police report and contacted the fire department at 20:01:06 – nearly three minutes before the undercover tactical unit had even arrived at my house.

The police log indicates that the undercover tactical unit only arrived on the scene at 20:03:56, only one second before the fire department, although an Officer Joseph Kruschel was logged in as being on the scene at 20:03:28.

Kruschel, however, evidently remained out of sight in order to allow the three-man tactical team to approach the Bollyn family first. This action indicates that there was a plan to provoke a confrontation. The three-man tactical unit was led by an officer named Michael Barber who had worked with the Department of Homeland Security in Katrina-ravaged New Orleans.

Barber was also the officer who TASERed me in front of my wife and 8-year-old daughter while I was handcuffed and forcibly restrained by two men who pinned me to the ground. Another officer named Timothy J. Stoy, a former jail guard at Cook County Jail, restrained me for the duration of the assault by kneeling with his full body weight (ca. 200 lbs.) on the temple of my head as Barber TASERed me. This tactic is employed to paralyze the victim by putting intense pressure on the nerve center on the side of the head.

My wife said that my face had turned purple and that my eyes were bulging out of my head and that I appeared to have great difficulty breathing. Shocked by the brutal assault, my wife Helje tried to photograph the assault but was told by the third unidentified man, who we later discovered was Officer Darin Felgenhauer, that if she dared to take any photos she would be arrested as well.

Helje, who grew up in Soviet-occupied Estonia and who traveled widely in the Soviet Union, says that she never experienced such police brutality anywhere, although she was politically active and married to a well-known Estonian rock singer and political dissident against the Soviet occupation of Estonia. She and her former husband, Urmas Alender, who perished in the 1994 sinking of Estonia, had been monitored by the notorious KGB for years.

Gorvett looked into the fire department log and found that the first fire department vehicle was on the scene at 20:03:57 – exactly one second after the undercover police tactical unit arrived. This corroborates Helje's testimony that the fire department was on the scene before I was TASERed. Indeed, the fire department was on the scene before any contact was made between the police and my family.

Two days later, we asked Chief of Police Clint Herdegen to explain why so many police and the fire department had been called to the scene. He said the fire department medics are called when somebody has been TASERed.

So why were they on the scene before I was TASERed? And why were 11 police officers on the scene of a non-emergency 911 call? Anybody would wonder about such an overwhelming response to a simple call to the police concerning a suspicious vehicle in the neighborhood.

The police tactical unit that marched up my driveway was completely unwilling to identify themselves or explain their purpose at my home. The unidentified men appeared eager for a confrontation and within a minute of their arrival, they had assaulted and TASERed me. I had committed no crime and there had been no arrest, warnings, or orders given prior to the assault. Furthermore, I was completely unable to resist the attack by the three men in any way during the assault.

Twenty-nine seconds after arriving at my house, at 20:04:26, the fire department emergency crew notified dispatch that they were back in service, although they did not leave the scene. They gave the "back in service" notification before the tactical unit had assaulted and TASERed me – something they must have witnessed.

The medics' failure to examine me indicates that the fire department's policy is inadequate in regard to TASER victims. Gorvett told me that the department does not even have policy guidelines relating to medical treatment of TASER victims.

I told Chief Gorvett that many healthy people have died shortly after being TASERed and asked why the medics had not checked my health after I had been TASERed in front of professional medics, while I had been forcibly restrained. According to Chief Herdegen, the use of the TASER is why the fire department had been called to the scene in the first place.

Had the medics checked my condition they would have seen that I was not drunk or on drugs, as the fabricated police report alleges, and would have seen that my elbow was injured. They may have even noticed the superficial wounds caused by the TASER gun. But they didn't examine me. Why not?

Gorvett told me that the fire department records indicate that police officer Wesley Schultz, who was logged on the scene at 20:07:18, had told the fire department medics that their services were not needed. This is the same officer who came to my cell in the middle of the night to tell me that because I had been TASERed the medics would have to examine me. Concerned about my sore elbow, I waited for the medics for several hours – but they never came. As a result, my fractured elbow was not looked at until one day later when I went to the local hospital clinic.

While Schultz told me that the medics had been called to examine me because of being TASERed, Gorvett searched the log for the night of August 15, 2006, and found that there had been no calls from the police department to have the fire department medics assist or examine any detainee during the time I was incarcerated. (He actually found no calls from the police station between 20:01 and 01:42 the next morning.)

This evidence from the fire department indicates that the police had a very different agenda than simply responding to a non-emergency 911 call. The Hoffman Estates police can be reached by phone at (847) 882-1818.

As a result of this police attack, I was charged with resisting arrest and aggravated assault. I was attacked by people associated with American Free Press immediately after the police assault. Fighting these baseless charges has cost me a great deal of money and energy. I am convinced that this attack was orchestrated by people in the government who are opposed to my research and writings about 9/11 and other subjects. Not a single media outlet in the United States has discussed this brutal and unjustified police attack on an independent American journalist.

Where is the free press in America? After the assault, American Free Press fired me and has punished me by withholding the money they collected in my name for my legal defense. They also refuse to reimburse my business expenses incurred during the summer of 2006. Why did they turn against me so quickly?

It is only thanks to generous supporters that I am able to challenge this abuse of power by the police. People who want to support me in the struggle against police brutality and malicious prosecution are welcome to donate to my legal defense fund at:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn/Bollyn-Legal-fund.html

I am currently in the process of changing legal counsel and will appear in court on April 7 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 107 at the Cook County Circuit Court in Rolling Meadows to have attorney Paul P. Moreschi take over my case from Jack Smeeton.

Smeeton, who had withheld the evidence contained in the police report and transmission log from me, said, "They came. It's a fact." He clearly sided with the police and totally ignored the details and significance of this evidence that the police conspired against me. This material came into his possession only because I had filed FOIA requests for it before he was even retained as my legal counsel.

Smeeton completely disregarded Helje's testimony and said that I have no case. He was strongly opposed to a jury trial and urged me to accept a plea bargain in which I would accept guilt for resisting arrest.

When we first met Jack Smeeton at the court, he said he was English. Helje, a scholar of English language and literature, said that I was related to the family of Anne Boleyn, the second wife of Henry VIII. Smeeton said that he is related to Mark Smeaton, the court musician who, under torture, provided false testimony against Anne Boleyn in 1536.

See: http://tudorhistory.org/boleyn/

As a result of Mark Smeeton's false testimony, Anne Boleyn and five men lost their heads.

The evidence indicates that the Hoffman Estates police had a very different agenda with Christopher Bollyn than simply responding to his non-emergency 911 call about a suspicious vehicle.

The Hoffman Estates police can be reached by phone at (847) 882-1818.

Richard Porter, the head of news at BBC World issued this explanation of the BBC World video:

1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.

4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another.

5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy... "

Below are some selected comments made in reply to Mr Porter's explanation:

How deservedly ironic that the BBC gets exposed for what it really is (a propaganda bureau that attempts to indoctrinate Britain and the world with a false reality) so soon after the airing of the appalling hit piece (9/11 conspiracy files) last Sunday night. Please show some respect for the BBC and the license fee paying public by answering a simple question. How did the BBC know that Building 7 was going to collapse 20 minutes before it actually did when prior to 9/11 no steel-structured building had ever collapsed due to fire?

I'm not a conspiracy nut. But this footage of your reports of WTC7 collapsing a full 20 minutes prior and repeatedly discussing it's collapse is highly suspicious.

If you were talking about a building that never did collapse, well then you'd just look incompetent. But as we all know, building 7 did, in a feat that suspended all laws of physics and logic, collapse spontaneously due to fires on floors 7 & 12.

You can't possibly expect us to believe this. Let's look at all the pieces here.

1. BBC reports for 20 solid minutes that WTC7 has collapsed when even in the live shot it stands as sturdy as the day it was built.

2. The idea that WTC7 would collapse spontaneously due to minor fires and minimal damage to the north face is laughable and an insult to intelligence. But it did, approximately 5 minutes AFTER BBC's report....or at least 5 minutes after Jane Standley's live shot was disconnected.

3. BBC loses all of it's 9/11 footage so this cannot be reviewed or explained. My nephew still has all his VHS tapes from that day. He recorded almost every news station for 24 hours straight. He's 19 now. He was 13 when it happened. So, a 13 year old can be more responsible with his VHS tapes than one of the largest news organizations?

4. The archive footage is mysteriously pulled off of YouTube and Google video repeatedly and without provocation or explanation.

5. BBC's response is, 'there is no conspiracy. it was a mistake.'

Grant us logical thinkers at least one thing. This is highly suspicious. The BBC needs to reveal what source they drew the conclusion that WTC7 had collapsed.

Oh, and the ez-out phrases like 'it appears' and 'we're receiving reports that..' were not used throughout this footage.

Especially when the anchor starts talking about the (lack of) body count since there was so much time to evacuate since the collapse of WTC 1-2.

The BBC needs to reveal what source they drew the conclusion that WTC7 had collapsed. I do not necessarily think the BBC is a witting participant in some 9/11 conspiracy, but it's definitely looking like you were a pawn. Revealing who/where the BBC received the information that WTC7 had collapsed would be a good start in clearing your name.

To report that a building had collapsed before it had done so would be an odd sort of error, wouldn't it? A bit like reporting that the Lord Mayor's trousers had fallen down before they did so.

Let's say for a second that you messed up and reported a building going down that didn't - why the exact one that DID? What are the odds? Why not by mistake report a building going down that DIDN'T actually go down?

You lose footage of one of the most important days in modern history... ;)
(Good job! That way no one can "prove" anything that day...)
Out of all the surrounding buildings that suffered massive damage - WTC 3,4,5,6 - and assorted others that suffered minor damage (amoung them, WTC 7 - Salomon Brothers Building), BBC - by merely a mistake and in confusion - picked exactly the right one that was going to fall -.... ;)
(Good job! Hey, BBC is incompetent - they lose tapes AND they claim buildings fall that haven't - but what LUCK! They hit the lottery! What a 'lucky guess', huh?)

BBC should go to Vegas, with those odds - you'd be rich.

BBC is not part of the conspiracy - but you are just a bunch of pathetic dupes.

You capture the biggest smoking gun in history ... and your response is ..... to call yourselves incompetent and go play 'blind/deaf/dumb monkey' on your public.

Good job, Guys!!


"If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that."

Uh, it WASN'T an error... That's the point. You keep harping on about what a chaotic day it was. Then why didn't the anchor say something like, "We're getting some unconfirmed reports of some other building apparently collapsing... We'll have to check up on this... etc." No, he had (23 minutes before hand) the name of the building, the correct # of floors in the building (47), the explanation of the collapse (weakened by other collapses), and he was reporting that the building was apparently empty. You even had graphics made up for the scrolling info at the bottom of the screen. That is some pretty precise reporting for a day of chaos when everyone was "...trying to make sense of what they were seeing... and what was being told by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services."

And there lies the key (perhaps). No doubt the info was just being fed to the anchor and reporter off the wires as the news would cross... So, which agency fed that bit about WTC7 collapsing? AP? Reuters? VOA? We'll probably never know, but you got the information from some source more than 23 minutes before it happened (had to be longer than 23 minutes, because there must have been some delay from the time the story came over the wires and the time the anchor actually got the news out on the air).

Do I think the BBC is "...part of a conspiracy"? No... but you were played perfectly by some entity, IMO.

With respect, the response to this issue is unacceptable. At the very least you are minimizing your error and trivializing the life’s lost or the potential of life’s that could have been saved.

In the most important final 7 minutes and 15 seconds of the said segment the words "apparently", "it's reported" or "we're hearing" ARE NOT USED in context of building 7.
The words used are those have definite and past tense.

"Now more on the latest building collapse in New York,...the Solomon Brothers Building collapse... and indeed it has"

"What can you tell us about the Salomon Building and it's collapse?"

"When it collapsed"

Ticker –“The 47 storey Salomon Brothers building close to the World Trade Centre has also collapsed.”

Who is responsible for the newsroom in desk and floor prompters being used by the news presenter?
Who is responsible for the news report on the bottom screen news ticker?
Who is responsible as the newsroom floor source for giving these people information?
What is the complete list of editors and journalists responsible for this program on said day?

The words in your statement #4 of footage being lost may very well redefine irresponsible. The BBC Media Management policy clearly states TWO broadcast standard copies be retained one on a separate site as a master.

As follows.

Ref No.
Policy Area / Policy Statement
01
Components to be Retained
01-01

The following components to be retained:-

Two broadcast standard copies of all transmitted/published TV, Radio and BBCi output – one to be stored on a separate site as a master

One browse-quality version for research purposes, to protect the broadcast material

http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/docs/historical_information/archive_policies/media_management_policy
_overview.htm#top


If the footage had continued, we'd all have been able to watch WTC 7 collapse right on your program.

Good thing you lost the feed five minutes before THAT happened in front of all your viewers.

What in the world would you have said if that had happened?

What is going on here?

I'd like a little truth please.

I never actually thought I would live to see the day that things would surpass even Orwell, Huxley, Wells, Jack London, Sinclair Lewis, Zamyatin, Ayne Rand, on and on...but, the virtual reality that the "media" create for us now is truly more unfathomable than even those great minds warned us of.

Contrary to the dismissive tone of the "explanation", whether or not the building was known to be about to fall goes to essential point of culpability for 9/11, foreknowledge.

Those who are in the dock and being cross-examined are not allowed to wave their hands and create a plausible explanation. It's gone too far for that. There is a disastrous war built on false evidence, and that falsification process may have begun much sooner than is generally now understood.

In ordinary life, a witness who lies about one thing will be assumed to lie about everything. And we aren't talking about private matters, but about the essential role of a government to defend its country. This issue is about credibility of news sources during a terror attack, in which a rush to judgment resulted shortly in an invasion of a sovereign nation, and the BBC know it.

Thousands upon thousands of lives have been lost thus far, and there are doubtless more to come.

Media Blacklists BBC Fiasco; Google, Digg Censor 9/11 Truth
News 24 'timestamp' video disappears from Google Video, despite the fact it's under 30 seconds in length and clearly constitutes fair use, Digg lets small minority of morons decide its content

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, March 1, 2007

The crowned kings of censorship Google have "pulled" the News 24 "timestamp" video that shows the BBC reporting the collapse of Building 7 26 minutes before it happened. Meanwhile, the establishment media continues to ignore the WTC 7 farce as a whole, including the inconceivable notion that BBC World have mysteriously lost all their 9/11 footage.

Despite the fact that the clip is under 30 seconds in length and clearly constitutes fair use, Google yanked the video last night after it was prominently featured in our article yesterday. We have replaced the video with a You Tube composite of both the "Jane Standley" footage and the News 24 clip, but for how long this stays active remains to be seen.

Google and the BBC have a cozy relationship and are currently at an advanced stage of talks to content share on Google Video. This could explain why the original "Standley" footage was yanked by Google within hours of it becoming popular on the Internet on Monday afternoon.

It seems that the BBC are extremely incompetent when it comes to looking after their own archived tapes, but remarkably proficient about getting any embarrassing material scrubbed off the Internet, with the eager aid of "don't be evil" Google, they compose a formidable tag team of censorship.

Recall that Google bizarrely wiped a leading mainstream news website from their search engine altogether last year simply because Space War carried articles mildly critical of Google's beloved Communist Chinese paymasters, for whom Yahoo have also shopped numerous dissidents who have ended up in China's re-education labor camps.

It was also Google Video that were caught on numerous occasions re-setting viewing figures for Alex Jones' Terror Storm and other 9/11 truth films, to prevent them entering the higher echelons of the charts and going viral.

Should all this really surprise us when it was CIA seed money that got Google off the ground in the first place? Just how many calls did Google's CIA liaison Dr. Rick Steinheiser make from his Office of Research and Development this week?

Meanwhile, a programmer claims to have hacked Digg and found evidence of a deliberate campaign to censor controversial news stories and those relating to 9/11 truth.

The Information Liberation website concludes that there are "Tons of obvious shills burying our recent explosive WTC 7 articles as well as many other articles of extreme significance. It's shocking to read the list and see how much significant, documented, and extremely popular content is being buried for obvious ideological reasons. This is completely undemocratic abuse of the Digg system and is proof positive the Bury feature is being abused to suppress content by vindictive Anti-Diggers."
The buried list contains the original Building 7 story that was posted at Prison Planet.com on Monday afternoon. It's reason for burial is given as "inaccurate," despite the fact that we have proven its factual basis in triplicate and the BBC has also tacitly admitted their "error."

Digg's Bury feature is supposed to be used to bury "stories with bad links, off-topic content, or duplicate entries" in order to remove "spam out of the system." Unfortunately, as many have experienced, the Bury feature is frequently used to suppress content based off ideology. Please encourage Digg to either fix it (perhaps make it similar to Reddit's down voting) or remove it all together. Email Digg here and request they please fix the Bury feature.
Whether you choose to believe that it's solely the work of moronic debunkers or a deliberate Digg policy to censor 9/11 truth, the fact remains that their supposed "democratic" system is nothing of the sort. Even if an article gets 2000 diggs, just a fraction of that number in burials relegates it to the memory hole. Digg should be more honest about the fact that the content of their website is determined at the behest of a small minority of semi-retarded Playstation addicted teenagers rather than the popular interest of the online community as a whole.

We have uncovered further evidence of Digg censorship and it will feature on the website later tonight.

48 hours after the BBC issued its pathetic rebuttal to startling footage that shows their correspondent Jane Standley live on 9/11 reporting the collapse of Building 7 as it mockingly stands behind her, and the inconceivable excuse that the BBC has lost its 9/11 tapes, no establishment media has picked up on the story, not even to dismiss it as a "conspiracy theory."

This represents both the stubborn refusal of the dinosaur press to accept the increasing trend that the Internet sets the news agenda, and also an appalling media culture that highlights the most inconsequential claptrap and gives it undeserved prominence.

Kudos goes to Wonkette for covering the Building 7 story, but almost every other so-called "progressive" website has been mute. Crooks and Liars, one of the biggest liberal blogs on the web, today spotlights a story about lesbian koala bears. On Tuesday night they led with a gossip puff piece about Mitt Romney's hair. How can these gatekeepers claim to represent "alternative media" when they stuff this kind of crap down our throats on a daily basis, while ignoring massive stories like the WTC 7 fiasco?

We invited BBC World head of news Richard Porter to appear on The Alex Jones Show and clarify for us exactly how the BBC managed to lose its footage, which by the BBC's own regulations has to be archived three times over, from the single most important event in history since World War 2.

Porter refused to do the interview.

Why No Norad On 911?
By Douglas Herman, USAF Veteran
Exclusive to Rense.com
2-26-7


"We, to this day, don't know why NORAD told us what they told us. It was just so far from the truth." -- Thomas H. Kean, Commission Chairman, to the Washington Post:

At best, the top US generals tasked with defending the skies above America failed miserably on September 11, 2001. Dereliction of duty, resulting in the death of even one person, is a serious court martial offense. At worst, US Generals Myers, Arnold, Eberhart and Weaver, among many others, were guilty of something far greater. NORAD and the Pentagon chiefs not only failed, but apparently intended to fail, to protect the skies above America, resulting in the deaths of nearly 3,000 citizens.

I will get to my primary theory why NORAD pilots were not permitted to intercept ANY of the four alleged hijacker jetliners on September 11, 2001. As everyone knows by now, the four jumbo jets were "allegedly" hijacked. I use the word allegedly because not one of the eight Boeing pilots and co-pilots pushed a four digit code to alert air traffic controllers their planes were being hijacked.

In the nearly 40 minutes between the second WTC tower being struck and the Pentagon being hit, not one USAF fighter plane circled Washington DC. NOT ONE. Andrews Air Force base is about 10-12 air miles from the US capitol by air, less than 90 seconds by fighter jet. NORAD, at that time, was nowhere to be seen.

According to official hearings, held two days after 9-11 the following pertinent questions arose. The reply is revealing as were the result.

SENATOR BILL NELSON: "General Myers, The second World Trade tower was hit shortly after 9:00. And the Pentagon was hit approximately 40 minutes later. That's approximately. You would know specifically what the timeline was. The crash that occurred in Pennsylvania after the Newark westbound flight was turned around 180 degrees and started heading back to Washington was approximately an hour after the World Trade Center second explosion. You said earlier in your testimony that we had not scrambled any military aircraft until after the Pentagon was hit. And so, my question would be: Why?"

GENERAL MYERS: "I think I had that right, that it was not until then. I'd have to go back and review the exact timelines."

SENATOR BILL NELSON: "Commenting from CNN on the timeline, 9:03 is the correct time that the United Airlines flight crashed into the south tower of the World Trade Center; 9:43 is the time that American Airlines flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon. And 10:10 a.m. is the time that United Airlines flight 93 crashed in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. So that was 40 minutes between the second tower being hit and the Pentagon crash. And it is an hour and seven minutes until the crash occurred in Pennsylvania."

You be the judge here: Was this a massive case of incompetence or were top US generals used as scapegoats on 911? Had SecDef Rumsfeld and Vice president Cheney overridden their powers and quietly assumed command of NORAD in the months before 911? Who was in charge?

According to Micharl Kane: "The war games & terror drills played a critical role in ensuring no Air Force fighter jocks - who had trained their entire lives for this moment - would be able to prevent the attacks from succeeding. These exercises were under Dick Cheney's management."

Prior to the attack, Cheney retreated to the underground shelter of the White House and monitored the incoming flight 77 from there. Curiously, he sought shelter in what would seem to be the top target of any terrorist.

Although Washington DC contained several top targets in the country---the White House, Senate building and Pentagon among others--landmarks representing the status and supremacy of the US, and although the "attack" on America was fully 45 minutes underway, not a single NORAD plane patrolled the skies above DC.

"The facts were not only evidence of incompetence at the highest level, they were suspicious on their face because they smacked of a stand-down; which, if true, was treason," wrote Mark Gaffney. "Within days (after 911) the Pentagon amended its story to allay such concerns."

But where, exactly, were NORAD fighters?

Many were already airborne. Atlantic City F-16 fighters were airborne and only eight minutes away. They were never dispatched. ( Atlantic City F-16 Fighters Were Eight Minutes Away From 9/11) to provide air cover to nearby New York City. Why?

"Under NORAD procedures that date to the Cold War, two F-16 fighters from the 177th were parked around the clock on the Atlantic City runway. Pilots waited in a nearby building, ready to scramble," said Mike Kelly, of New Jersey Media Group. "But the 177th's jets were not on alert Sept. 11. A series of Pentagon cutbacks, beginning in 1998, changed the wing's mission from scramble-ready status to dropping bombs on enemy positions. In 2000, after two years of training, the 177th was even sent to Saudi Arabia to fly patrols over southern Iraq as part of Operation Southern Watch."

Other NORAD fighters, notably from Otis AFB in Delaware, flew far offshore the Atlantic coastline on 911, part of a series of military exercises that, in a highly suspicious coincidence, occurred simultaneously on September 11, 2001. One of the Otis intercept pilots lamented: "We've been over the flight a thousand times in our minds and I don't know what we could have done to get there any quicker."

William Thomas, a former US Navyman and foreign correspondent, remarked: "For starters, he and his wingman could have tried pushing their twin throttles fully forward. Instead of flying two-and-a-half times faster than a bullet, 'Nasty' and 'Duff' drove their expensive air superiority fighters at a leisurely 447-mph, supposedly to intercept a Boeing 767 flying 43 mph faster!"

When asked why these USAF interceptors were not summoned quicker, to protect New York City, Air National Guard General Paul Weaver said to reporters that each one of the F-15 fighters (top speed 2.5 /1650 mph) flew '"like a scalded ape, topping 500 mph but were unable to catch up to the airliner."

Scalded ape? World War 2 fighter planes flew faster than that--fifty years ago. So why didn't any NORAD fighters intercept the slow-moving Boeings? Was it because of what the fighter pilots might have seen---or was it because of what they couldn't be allowed to see? You be the judge. Here are four possibilities.

1. United and American airlines pilots gesturing wildly, that the jumbo jets were remote controlled.

2. Muslim hijackers ignoring the fighter pilot commands. Had NORAD intercepted the planes, the Boeings would be warned to divert course and, if not, shot down.

3. Nobody at the controls. Instead the planes were remote controlled drones resembling big Boeings.

4. Muslim patsies in the cockpit, gesturing helplessly, at the helm of remote controlled Boeings they were unable to control.

The "official" version is number 2. But one would have thought, given the circumstances, that at least one top gun of NORAD should have closed with at least ONE Boeing and observed it closely--or even shot it down. Right? Perhaps Flight 93 was that ill-fated bird. Instead we are told a heroic struggle ensued. This passenger resistance, whether true or not, provided a fat more inspiring tale and became the single most uplifting note on an overwhelmingly tragic day.

But in explaining the failure of NORAD, pilots had to be kept away, far away, from the first three. They could not be allowed to make VISUAL contact with the planes. They could NOT look down into the cockpits and report what they saw, or didn't see. They had to be diverted far off shore--or not even launched. And so they were. Those hijacked planes--whether remote controlled drones or big Boeings piloted by Muslims--needed to accomplish their mission. Had the NORAD pilots radioed back that the hijackers couldn't control the planes---or that nobody was at the controls of drones---imagine how the entire fabricated story of 911 would have collapsed.

So the FAA had to be the scapegoat. Not NORAD. If the Pentagon--under attack---needed a fresh infusion of cash, since hundreds of billions (2.3 trillion reportedly) was missing---they would have to be exonerated. And That was why, finally, General Richard Myers, seated in his office (allegedly) throughout the ENTIRE 911 attack, was promoted for his inactions (rather than convicted in a military court martial) for dereliction of duty, along with numerous other officials after 911.

At Confirmation Hearings in Washington DC before the Senate Armed Services Committee, while the fires still raged at the WTC and the Pentagon still smoldered, General Richard Myers was nominated and accepted as the Chairman of The Joint Chiefs of Staff, on SEPTEMBER 13, 2001. And the Pentagon got their fresh billions.

And 343 firefighters got sent to Fresh Kills.

Douglas Herman wrote the suspense thriller, The Guns of Dallas, soon to be a major motion picture starring Robert de Niro, and writes for Rense regularly.

BBC Response to the early report of the WTC7 collapse.

"It was a simple goof. That's all. Honest!" -- BTN
(Ahem)

The key thing about this non-denial denial is that they in no way claim that the footage is inaccurate or faked. It really does show a BBC reporter announcing the collapse of the WTC-7 while the building is clearly still standing behind her.

(response from the BBC below)

1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.

4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another.

THE SMOKING GUN WTC7, BBC JUMPS THE GUN !!!

February 26, 2007
THE SMOKING GUN WTC7, BBC JUMPS THE GUN !!!
9/11 Building 7 Collapse - WTC7 23 Minute Warning - Salomon Brothers Building

BBC Error ! Huge smoking gun of pre-knowledge collapse of WTC7 *911blogger.com

“On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.

This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.

9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.

What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.

Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.

So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.

No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.” *911Blogger.com

It’s here!!! The smoking gun of 9/11 that can not be disputed. BBC reporters jump the gun reporting the collapse of WTC7 until they cut the feed just 5 minutes prior to the actual demolition. People, the news is choreographed, this proves it and shows how wide spread the disinfo goes. No more denial, this is it….. they have to strike now. I can’t wait for the spin on this blunder, it will be extremely brazen. The timeline is indeed accurate given the anchor’s comments at 00:17:30 into the video where he states “it has been some 8 hours since the attack.” 9 am plus 8 equals 5 pm !!!!! If this clip is faked, then they did an excellent job and we need to know who did it.

**EDITORS NOTE**… PLEASE SOMEONE MAKE A DUPLICATE OF THIS VIDEO IN CASE IT IS PULLED!!!

update 6:49 pm eastern time, Google has pulled the video completely from their site. I have access to a crude copy and will work diligently to get it back on.

NATIONWIDE MANHUNT ENDS

Let’s see if we got everything straight about the heroic hunt for Hunt.
Eli Weasel, age 78, is a hero who courageously survived the Nazi death camps at Auschwitz, Buchenwald, and elsewhere during World War II, and then bravely worked for human rights in many parts of the world, saving millions of people. In 1986 he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. He is the intrepid author of more than 40 books based on his hideous, horrible, holocaust experiences. Today he “teaches” at Boston University. (In reality he’s a flaming Zionist, a notorious liar, and a holocaust poseur. He also worked as a journalist for the terrorist Irgun gang, which committed the 1948 massacre at Deir Yassin. In April 2006, Alexander Cockburn demolished Weasel’s book Night as a pack of lies. For example, Eli Weasel goes on and on about how the Nazis slowly burned their victims to death in crematories, while all other “witnesses’” claim that Jews were killed in gas chambers.)
On February 1, Weasel went to a San Francisco conference organized by the Rock Rose institute, and then went to the Argent Hotel. A man approached him in the elevator and asked for an interview. Weasel bravely said he would grant an interview in the hotel lobby, but his assailant wanted an interview in a hotel room, and entered the elevator with Weasel. On the sixth floor, Weasel claimed the man dragged him out of the elevator. Weasel screamed, and the man departed. Weasel, unharmed, courageously told police that the man’s wallet and identification could be found in a car in the hotel’s parking garage. (How did Weasel know this ??????)
Zionist web sites demanded to know why this event was not broadcast on the international news.
On February 6, a man identifying himself as Eric Hunt posted his account of the event on several Web sites, including Ziopedia.org. (Not to be confused with Ziopedia.com.)
On February 9, the ADL began a nationwide manhunt for this psychopath, but no troops were pulled out of Iraq to assist. The ADL’s Internet monitoring unit placed calls and an e-mail to Ziopedia’s registered owner, Andrew Winkler, but all communications were simply ignored.
Zionist groups say the “holocaust denial” conference in Iran has inspired holocaust deniers to become incredibly violent, with Eric Hunt being only the first example. Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said: “This shows a new brazen attitude” among holocaust deniers.
Meanwhile on February 9, Eric Hunt contacted his father, Frank Hunt, 49, who works as a prison guard in Archbald, Pennsylvania. Eric Hunt said his car was in the shop, and asked to be picked up at a bus station in Scranton, Pennsylvania. His father came to get him, and later told police he had not seen Eric Hunt for 11 years before that. Eric Hunt stayed with his father for two days.
On February 14, Google disabled its ads that appear on Ziopedia.org. Also, Paypal said it was investigating to determine if Ziopedia.org could continue to use Paypal to receive donations. Meanwhile, Web traffic soared on Ziopedia. Andrew Winkler says he gauges Ziopedia’s success on the amount of hate e-mail received each week. Less than 3 are poor, but 10 or more excellent. After the Weasel incident, hate mail increased dramatically. Winkler says numerous Internet security software vendors have blacklisted Ziopedia under categories such as hate, violence, racism and political extremism, which makes it harder for people to visit Ziopedia.org from their workplaces, or from public libraries. Meanwhile StormPay suspended Ziopedia.org’s account.
On February 16, a judge issued a warrant for Hunt’s arrest. San Francisco police alerted their brave counterparts in Montgomery Township, N.J. — who then tracked Hunt through his credit card purchases.
On February 17, New Jersey police found Hunt in a mental health treatment center in Belle Mead, N.J., located 60 miles from Hunt’s home. Police said Hunt’s mother checked him in. (Apparently Hunt knew the police were after him, and checked into the clinic knowing he would have to use an insanity defense.) Hunt was arrested and charged with stalking, battery, attempted kidnapping, false imprisonment, committing a hate crime, and elder abuse. He is being held without bail in the Somerset County Jail in New Jersey, awaiting extradition to San Francisco.
Lt. Dan Mahoney, head of special investigations for San Francisco police, said Hunt is a holocaust denier who began following holocaust denial organizations after graduating from college. Mahoney said that although Hunt used the Internet to spread profound evil, Hunt acted alone.
Today, Abe Fucksman of the Anti-Defecation League said on his Web site that Hunt’s arrest, “sends a very clear message that holocaust denial is unacceptable. It can have grave consequences on personal level, on a national level, and international level. It must be taken seriously, whether it comes from an individual like Eric Hunt, or a political leader like Ahmadinejad of Iran.”
Zionist gangs hope this incident will spur more countries to adopt “hate crime” legislation. Germany is now pushing for all E.U. member states to outlaw holocaust study. Currently 7 out of 27 E.U. countries have laws specifically outlawing scholarly study. Germany, which currently holds the rotating presidency of the E.U., is hoping to pass new laws before its six-month term is up in July 2007. British historian David Irving served 13 months in an Austrian jail after being found guilty of studying the holocaust. Ernst Zundel just received another five years, and now sits in prison in Mannheim, Germany.
Hillary Clinton weighed in, saying, “The shameful attack on Elie Wiesel is a violent reminder that we must continue to speak out against holocaust denial and against hate crimes that seek to silence free speech.”
COMMENT
Imagine telling the average American, “Did you know that if you study the holocaust, you will go to prison? If you find out that the whole thing was a lie, and you explain that lie to someone else, then international police will hunt you. Did you know that if someone writes an account of being in the Nazi labor camps, and you expose that account as a lie, a fiction, you can be imprisoned as a holocaust denier?”
Who would believe you?
Who wouldn’t call YOU a liar?
How is this any different from a science fiction movie in which the earth has been quietly taken over by aliens, and anyone who exposes those aliens is removed?

UFO phenomena and Remote Viewing are well "documented"

The Holocaust is well "documented".

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour also paid the price for speaking honestly about the cause of suffering in Palestine. On Nov. 29, 2006, she visited the Gaza Strip in the wake of Israel’s massacre of Beit Hanoun and charged Israel with committing massive human rights violations.
“The human rights situation in the occupied Palestinian territory is grave and worsening, within a general climate of impunity. Overall I was struck throughout my visit by the sense of vulnerability and abandonment that was expressed to me by virtually all the civilians that I met, both in Israel and in the occupied Palestinian territories,” AFP quoted her as saying.
It’s hard to argue with first-hand evidence, but that didn’t stop B’nai B’rith Canada’s Vice President Frank Dimant from shooting his mouth off, and shooting The Lobby in the foot: “(This was) yet another attempt by the UN body to delegitimize the Jewish state.”
Note the implication in this statement. Dimant has directly equated Israel’s legitimacy with the commission of atrocities!

A new book I recommend highly for the new year is Don Scott’s The ELECTRIC SKY. It is an important book because it encourages informed people to “demand reasonable answers to reasonable questions” from space scientists. It is easy to be intimidated by the flood of bizarre claims from astrophysicists and cosmologists and become “convinced that nonsense is ruling the world.” The ELECTRIC SKY offers a refreshing, practical alternative. This work is not “fringe” science. It is based on the work of Nobel Prize winners whose work has been selectively and incorrectly applied by theoretical astrophysicists. When viewed from a practical electrical engineering standpoint, the fog of misconceptions and misinformation clears and a new vision of the universe appears. The ELECTRIC SKY should appeal to the informed reader. It is based upon sound electrical engineering principles and confirmed by experiment. The ELECTRIC SKY argues that the universe is utterly different from what we have been taught to believe. With this new electrical circuit diagram the universe is transformed. As Bryan Appleyard writes, “If all that we have been doing has merely been an effective series of extrapolations on a series of assumptions that we now know to be flawed, then perhaps the truth of the world is far more radically different from anything which we have yet allowed ourselves to dream.” The ELECTRIC SKY is easily accessible to engineers; to the informed public; to scientists who have maintained a healthy skepticism; and to students who have not been indoctrinated with a catechism of defective assumptions. There is a mountain of data to be reexamined and countless new discoveries to be made. The payoff will be an explosion of possibilities in every area of science. The sooner the media becomes aware and allows the public to hear this new story, the sooner that public can decide to bring the scientific establishment to account. Instead of passive acceptance and waiting “until the present occupants of the astrophysics power structure have retired from the scene,” the issue should be forced. After all, it is our money they are squandering. Meanwhile, Scott has done us a service with the publication of The ELECTRIC SKY. With scientific manpower and billions of dollars being wasted every year chasing theoretical fantasies, he is right: “It’s time to decide.”

The Israeli Prime Minister's Connection to 9/11
by Christopher Bollyn 22 December 2006

Ehud Olmert, the current Israeli prime minister, seems to be more popular and influential with European and American politicians than he is among his own constituents.
After the disastrous and illegal invasion of Lebanon, which he foolishly provoked and prosecuted, an Israeli poll found that 63 per cent of Israelis wanted Olmert to resign.
Israeli forces committed a host of egregious war crimes during the month-long invasion, including targeting civilian areas and infrastructure and using banned weapons, such as phosphorus and cluster munitions.
While the vast majority of casualties were Lebanese civilians, at least 1,200 killed and 3,600 wounded, Israel paid a very high price for the ill-advised invasion, losing some 120 soldiers with many more severely wounded and maimed for life. The Hezbollah resistance succeeded in knocking out Israeli warships, helicopters, and scores of tanks.
In December 2006, however, it all seemed to be forgotten when Olmert visited the White House and European capitals where he was treated with unusual deference by the most powerful politicians of the western world.
In Rome, where Olmert met Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi and Pope Benedict XVI, a television camera caught Olmert telling Prodi exactly what to say before a press conference.
Olmert with Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi at Villa Madama in Rome

THE ISRAELI DICTATES
The footage, taken by an Israeli cameraman, shows Olmert telling Prodi to mention the international community's demands that the Hamas-led Palestinian government recognize Israel, renounce terror, and respect signed peace agreements.
"It's important for me that you emphasize the three principles of the Quartet, that they are not negotiable, that they are the basis for everything. Please say this," Olmert instructed the submissive Italian prime minister.
Olmert also asked Prodi to recognize Israel's status as a Jewish state, a position which would preclude and negate the fundamental Palestinian demand that the millions of displaced refugees and their descendants be allowed to return to their land and homes.
"I have heard you say something about the Jewish state," Olmert prompted the subservient Prodi, the former President of the European Commission.
At the press conference, the servile Prodi dutifully performed as instructed: "Every peace process must go through a renouncing of violence, recognition of the state of Israel, recognition of past agreements and, I must add, also the recognition of Israel as a Jewish state," Prodi said.
Olmert, whose military massacred hundreds of Lebanese women and children, including scores of innocent civilians in the biblical village of Cana only four months ago, asked Pope Benedict XVI to urge Christians to protest scientific inquiry into Zionist claims about the number of Jews killed over 60 years ago in Europe, according to Israeli officials.
Earlier, during a visit to Berlin, Olmert gave a television interview in which he admitted that Israel possesses nuclear weapons. Israel's nuclear activities are unlawful and have been conducted outside the purview of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
WHO IS OLMERT?
After his party, Kadima, won the election on March 28, 2006, Olmert became Israel's prime minister. His first two months in office were described as "the most criminal period" in Israeli history.
"Talking peace and drumming up support for his realignment plan of settlement, Ehud Olmert's 8 weeks in power proved to be the bloodiest, deadliest and the most criminal period of the 58-year-old state of Israel," Duraid Al Baik, foreign editor of Gulf News wrote in his article, "Olmert: The criminal who peddles peace."
"Since he was sworn in as the 12th prime minister of Israel on April 14, the Israelis have killed more than 50 Palestinians and injured around 200 almost at a rate of 1 killed and 4 injured per day," Al Baik wrote. "The new prime minister has set a record, surpassing the one established by his predecessor Ariel Sharon during the bloodiest days of the Palestinian uprising or intifada."
Although the controlled press in the United States ignores Israeli war crimes, Olmert's criminal links demand to be exposed because of his intimate connection to the convicted Israeli criminal who controlled airport security and passenger screening operations at Boston Logan Airport on 9/11.
This connection is just "the tip of the iceberg" – the most visible part of the Zionist criminal network behind the false flag terror attacks that ushered in the criminal aggression known as the "War on Terror."
ZIONIST GOALS
Although Zionists exert incredible influence on U.S. politics, Zionism itself remains a political philosophy woefully misunderstood by the majority of the U.S. population. Although President George W. Bush and his war cabinet are clearly controlled by Zionists and are advancing their agenda, an agenda promoted and supported by nearly every member of Congress, Zionism and its bloody history are subjects most Americans know virtually nothing about.
While American universities offer courses in practically every subject imaginable, a college curriculum offering a critical examination of Zionism and its history is not to be found.
The public's general ignorance of Zionism is compounded by the controlled media, which grossly distorts and misinterprets Zionism to make this un-American philosophy appear to be something positive and benevolent. The history of Zionist terror and ethnic cleansing, something most Israelis and Palestinians are well aware of, is utterly unknown to most Americans, primarily due to academic and media censorship.
After the false flag terror attacks of 9/11, which the evidence clearly indicates involved Israeli intelligence agents, and with more than 150,000 Americans engaged in costly and disastrous wars in the Middle East, Americans can no longer afford to remain ignorant of Zionism and its goals.
WHAT IS ZIONISM?
Zionism developed as a political movement alongside Communism in the late 1800s in the Jewish communities of the Russian Empire. In towns with large Jewish populations in Lithuania, Poland, Byelorussia, and the Ukraine, Zionism became a nationalistic movement for Jews. The Communist and Zionist movements were closely linked from the beginning.
The religious-political ideology of Zionism led Jews in search of a national identity to begin speaking and writing Hebrew, a reconstituted language which had not been spoken for thousands of years.
In the Soviet Union, Jews were considered a national group and Jewish "nationality" was denoted in Soviet passports. The Soviet dictator Josef Stalin even established the Jewish Autonomous Region of Birobidzan in 1934 with Yiddish as the official language.
Although the Eastern European Jews known as the Ashkenazi are not of Semitic origin, but largely descendents of Slavic and Asiatic converts to Judaism, Zionist zeal led them to misidentify themselves as "Hebrew," when, for example, they immigrated to the United States.
The primary objective of political Zionism has always been the formation of a purely Jewish state in Palestine, something which never existed. The fact that Palestine was already inhabited by Palestinians, the rightful owners of the land and descendents of Jews, Arabs, Greeks, and other races in the Holy Land, was something radical Zionists refused to accept.
The armed conquest and ethnic cleansing of Palestine was promoted in the 1930s by Vladimir (Ze'ev) Jabotinsky, one of the most militant Zionists. In 1937, Jabotinsky, born in Odessa, established the Irgun, a terrorist organization linked to his New Zionist Organization (N.Z.O) and the Betar youth movement.
The Jabotinsky ideology maintains that the Jewish people have exclusive rights to all the Land of Israel, which it claims extends from the Nile of Egypt to the Euphrates River in Iraq.
OLMERT AND JABOTINSKY
Ehud Olmert is an ideological child of Jabotinsky. Olmert's father, Mordechai, joined the right-wing Herut movement and the Irgun, then led by the notorious Zionist terrorist Menachem Begin. This movement evolved into the extreme far right Likud party.
Olmert's intensely right-wing family lived on a cooperative farm called Nahalat Jabotinsky. As a child, Olmert was a member of Betar, Jabotinsky's militaristic youth movement. Begin, the hard-line Israeli prime minister who held the credo "In blood and fire Judea fell; in blood and fire Judea shall rise," referred to Olmert as "Ehud, my son."
Olmert, a member of Israel's parliament since 1973, became mayor of occupied Jerusalem in 1993, and oversaw 10 years of illegal Israeli settlement and expansion. The occupied territory that Israelis now claim as Jerusalem extends from Bethlehem in the south to Ramallah in the north and nearly to Jericho in the east.
In the racist ideology of Jabotinsky Zionists like Olmert, there is simply no place for the Palestinians in the Land of Israel: "There is no choice: the Arabs must make room for the Jews of Eretz Israel," Jabotinsky wrote. "If it was possible to transfer the Baltic peoples, it is also possible to move the Palestinian Arabs."
The Israeli barrier wall that surrounds the Palestinians of the West Bank is an idea taken straight from Jabotinsky's 1923 book, The Iron Wall: We and the Arabs.
"Zionist colonization, even the most restricted, must either be terminated or carried out in defiance of the will of the native population. This colonization can, therefore, continue and develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local population – an iron wall which the native population cannot break through."
Olmert has provided weapons and training to support the "private army" of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in order to foment a civil conflict between Palestinian factions. Abbas is viewed by many Palestinians as a quisling working with the Israelis against the elected Palestinian government led by the Hamas party.
Among Olmert's terrorist actions prior to his aggression of Lebanon was the frequent shelling and bombing of civilians in Gaza. Eight members of one family were killed on the beach of Gaza in a particularly egregious Israeli terror attack on June 9, 2006. This blatant act of Zionist terror was followed by usual Israeli denial of responsibility although their armed forces had been shelling the Gaza Strip at the time the family was hit.
Mark Garlasco, a military expert working for the U.S.-based Human Rights Watch, was the first independent investigator to reach the scene of the crime. Garlasco found shrapnel from a 155 mm artillery shell. "My assessment [is] that it's likely that this was incoming artillery fire that landed on the beach and was fired by the Israelis from the north of Gaza," he said.
OLMERT AND ATZMON
Olmert, who has a long history of involvement in Israeli financial crimes, was indicted on charges of aggravated fraud, falsifying corporate documents, and violations of the tax code and Party Funding Law from crimes committed when he was the party treasurer for the Likud party in 1988.
The Likud fundraising scandal culminated in the March 1996 conviction of three Likudniks, including Menahem Atzmon, Olmert's co-treasurer. As the party treasurer, Olmert was indicted in the Likud crimes but received special treatment and was acquitted.
During the 1970s Olmert had worked in the law firm owned by another Atzmon, Uzi Atzmon.
Menahem J. Atzmon, Olmert's co-defendant and ally, was convicted in Israel but went on to become the founder and head of International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS). This Israeli-run company is the owner of Huntleigh USA, the airport security firm that ran passenger screening operations at the airports of Boston and Newark on 9/11.
Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of ICTS, a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by “former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies.”
Atzmon, convicted in Israel in 1996 for crimes committed with Likud party fund raising schemes, and his business partner Ezra Harel, took over passenger screening and security at the Boston and Newark airports when ICTS acquired Huntleigh USA in 1999.
United Flight 175 and American Flight 11, which allegedly struck the twin towers, both originated from Boston's Logan Airport, while United Flight 93, which purportedly crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from the Newark airport. Atzmon, a convicted Israeli criminal, is the CEO who also controls and operates the German port of Rostock on the Baltic Sea. The bus the blew up at Tavistock exploded outside the London office of ICTS.
Some 9/11 victims’ families brought lawsuits against Huntleigh USA claiming the security firm had been grossly negligent on 9-11. While these relatives have the right to know what the Israeli security company did or did not do to protect their loved ones on 9-11, Huntleigh, along with two other foreign security companies, was granted congressional protection in 2002 and will not be called to account for its actions in any U.S. court.
Atzmon, a convicted criminal, political ally and co-defendant of Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, was directly responsible for passenger and airline security at Boston's Logan Airport, whence the two airliners which struck the World Trade Center originated. His airport security firm is a prime suspect in the false flag terror attacks of 9/11.
Olmert's relationship with Atzmon and his responsibility for Boston's airport security on 9/11 is a conspicuous tip – completely ignored by the controlled press – of the Israeli and Zionist criminal network involved in the terror attacks that started the so-called "War on Terror."
How often do top Israeli officials and Rabbis join the Christmas or Easter celebrations at the White House or European governments?

Here is a list of Wealthy, Famous Jews who died in the Holocaust:

Supremacist Jews own amerika and its "media", from the Hollyweird pornographers to Wall St Shylocks, everyone knows that. He who pays the piper calls the tune and spins the fantasy.That's what makes amerika GRATE! The microcosm of Palestine shows us the future as these Zionazis envision it. Amerika's jewish dream is everybody else's worst nightmare. In the case of Palestine where the apartheid state called Izrael is murdering for land and water and goddamn let's be honest, it just feels good when you're a low life piece of IOF garbage! (thank goodness the Palestinians hadn't oil or there wouldn't be a child left breathing in that unfortunate land. Amerika, so long a willing sponsor of little pariah cancer Izrael thought the world would accept the same MO in Iraq but found that murdering armed Iraqis was not quite as simple as murdering defenceless Palestinians which supremacist Jews have been doing with impunity since at least 1948.It comes as no suprise that punk Bush wanted to bomb Al Jazeera as well as that blind loser David Blunkett (the German Shepard to Blair's poodle) who recently admitted in an interview to advising Blair to bomb Al Jazeera in Quatar.If these international war criminals couldn't accept a relatively free Arab press operating in the Arab world they are busy destroying, no wonder the Jew financier war machine and all its organs will do their damdest to make sure there is no other spin to their lies in amerika. They OWN the amerikan masses and will continue to milk these sheep and goats as they see fit. Simple repetitive propaganda laced with soft porn and platitudes, hubris and patriotic muck has worked like a charm and kept the masses docile and pliable and by god that's the way they want it to stay!"The truth" as Murdoch so aptly put it "is what I say it is."
- Ramirez

A Tricky Little Problem -The Missing "Holocaust"Richard Lynn Professor Emeritus University of Ulster12-19-05

"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement is quite correct-not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."

- Richard Lynn Professor Emeritus University of Ulster, December 5, 2005

Condi's Conundrum
Is she lying about her pre-9/11 briefing warning of a terrorist attack?

The 9/11 narrative contains all kinds of weird anomalies, such as this – and not to mention this, which has one of the five Israelis apprehended in the New York metropolitan area who were observed jumping for joy at the downing of the World Trade Center admitting that (1) they were accused of being Mossad agents, and (2) "Our purpose was to document the event." Sounds like at least a hint of foreknowledge to me, but then nothing of this was so much as mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report. U.S. government officials forced to comment on reports in the mainstream media that the Israelis had at least some foreknowledge of the 9/11 terrorist attacks dismissed them as an "urban myth."